首页> 外文OA文献 >Concurrent Criterion-Related Validity of Physical Examination Tests for Hip Labral Lesions: A Systematic Review
【2h】

Concurrent Criterion-Related Validity of Physical Examination Tests for Hip Labral Lesions: A Systematic Review

机译:并发标准相关的髋部唇部病变体格检查的有效性:系统评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Hip injuries are prevalent, especially within the athletic population. Of the hip injuries in this population, some 18–55% are lesions to the labrum of the hip. Clinical diagnosis of hip labral lesions is difficult because data on prevalence are varied. In addition, data on the prevalence of internal and external risk factors are absent as are data on the correlation of these risk factors with labral lesions, making it difficult to gauge the diagnostic utility. The mechanism of injury is often unknown or not specific to labral lesions. Internal risk factors may remain hidden to physical therapists because in most jurisdictions, ordering imaging tests is not within their scope of practice. Anterior inguinal pain seems highly sensitive for the diagnosis of patients with labral lesions but can hardly be considered specific; data on other pain-related and mechanical symptoms clearly have little diagnostic utility, making these data collected during the patient history almost irrelevant to diagnosis. By way of a comprehensive literature review and narrative and systematic analysis of the methodological quality of the retrieved diagnostic utility studies, this paper aimed to determine a diagnostic physical examination test or test cluster based on current best evidence for the diagnosis of hip labral lesions. Current best evidence indicates that a negative finding for the flexion-adduction-internal rotation test, the flexion-internal rotation test, the impingement provocation test, the flexion-adduction-axial compression test, the Fitzgerald test, or a combination of these tests provides the clinician with the greatest evidence-based confidence that a hip labral lesion is absent. Currently, research has produced no tests with sufficient specificity to help confidently rule in a diagnosis of hip labral lesion. Suggestions for future research are provided.
机译:髋部受伤很普遍,尤其是在运动人群中。在这一人群的髋部损伤中,约18-55%是髋臼唇的病变。髋唇病变的临床诊断很困难,因为患病率的数据各不相同。另外,缺乏关于内部和外部危险因素的患病率的数据,也没有关于这些危险因素与唇部病变的相关性的数据,这使得难以评估诊断效用。损伤的机制通常是未知的,或者不是特定于唇部病变的。内部风险因素可能对物理治疗师来说仍然是隐藏的,因为在大多数辖区,订购影像学检查不在他们的执业范围内。前腹股沟痛似乎对诊断唇唇病变的患者非常敏感,但很难被认为是特异性的。有关其他疼痛相关症状和机械症状的数据显然没有诊断价值,这使得在患者病史期间收集的这些数据几乎与诊断无关。通过全面的文献综述以及对检索到的诊断效用研究的方法学质量的叙述和系统分析,本文旨在根据当前最佳的髋唇病变诊断证据确定诊断性体格检查测试或测试组。当前的最佳证据表明,对内屈内旋试验,内屈内旋试验,撞击激发试验,内屈内压试验,菲茨杰拉德试验或这些试验的组合的阴性发现可提供具有最大的循证医学信心的临床医生认为髋臼唇病变不存在。目前,尚无足够特异性的试验能可靠地帮助诊断髋唇病灶。提供了未来研究的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号